Light(er) weight tele

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
Post Reply
User avatar
mattaboy
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:06 pm
Location: Boston
Ski style: On Piste downhill, learning to AT
Favorite Skis: Atomic RT80
Favorite boots: Crispi XP

Light(er) weight tele

Post by mattaboy » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:19 pm

So I climbed (part of) the Mount Washington auto road earlier this year with some friends. While it was fun, I'm certain I was the slowest person of the 100 or so folks at the event, except maybe a 12 year old and his mom. There I was with my Targas and Crispi XP boots, shuffling along, listening to people with AT gear saying "on your left" the whole time.

Now I'm not an expert at uphill travel, but I don't like being the slowest one in the group. Since then I've been working out, and strengthening my body to reduce the shame quotient when going uphill. Even so, I really can't go faster than anyone with a free pivot. I've demo'd NTN gear, and I could keep up with the modern stuff, but with the 75mm gear I own it's a bit of a challenge. I've already ordered a Targa Ascent in the mail, but I'm not sure if the free pivot solves the whole problem here.

Current setup:
Atomic RT80 166 w/ G3 Targa
The Targa will be swapped for the Ascent version when it arrives in the mail
Crispi XP boots

So Telemark Talk: what would you do?
Is a free pivot binding enough?
Would you start touring in T4's?
Are there any lighter, but supportive boots that could make this xcD venture easier in the forests of New England?

Note: I picked up Tele this year, so I'm not very good yet. I'm spending every day I can on lift hills to get my tele turn down before I hit the backcountry again. Even so, I'd like to find the best way to melt my friends' faces when we're touring next time.

User avatar
stilltryin
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:12 pm
Location: WYO USA
Ski style: Wandering the untracked (by humans)
Favorite Skis: Voile V6 BC; Karhu XCD/GT
Favorite boots: Scarpa T3; Alpina Alaska NNN-BC
Occupation: ExFed

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by stilltryin » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:44 pm

I think your Crispi is a 4-buckle boot. A T4 (2-buckle) will go up well, but it may not have the support for you to go down the same lines as the friends whose faces you want to melt. Always good to have gear that matches reasonably well with your friends. The T2 3-buckle might be a good choice.



User avatar
Spiny Norman
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:34 am

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by Spiny Norman » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:48 pm

Man must suffer for his art.



User avatar
spopepro
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by spopepro » Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:34 pm

There’s a lot going on here. First is the kind of skin track AT folks set, which is often unnecessarily steep. That’s where I think a free pivot binding will help, especially with duckbills. There’s only so far you can go until you’re fighting the resistance of the system with every step.

Second is that no plastic tele boot currently on the market has a good “walk mode”. There’s no way around this except going with leathers or tele-tech.

Straight up and down steep stuff isn’t really where tele gear shines. If you want to keep up with the AT folks in Lycra you’re going to need to be much stronger than them, even with light tele setups. Where tele shines is on rolling terrain and transitions. I’ll leave AT folks in the dust in those spots.

I wouldn’t change out gear, especially if you’re newish. First get stronger, and then you can decide if you want different tele gear, or if tele might not meet all your desires.



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2815
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by lowangle al » Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:03 am

The free pivot should be a big help and a T4 will help even more with keeping upon the uphill. I think the T4 is a good boot to learn on and being that you are just learning you're not going to keep up with AT skiers regardless of what boot you are on. The T4 might not be enough boot for the resort (it is for me) but you can use the Crispis for that.



User avatar
bornaginalpiner
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 11:47 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Ski style: Fall alot
Favorite Skis: Soft flex.
Favorite boots: The ones that fit.
Occupation: Well I like to spend my time enjoying life.

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by bornaginalpiner » Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:19 am

The most important thing about climbing is physical fitness regardless of the equipment. Sure you'll be able to climb a little bit faster with the Ascent, but that won't catch youup with physically fit AT skiers.

I think the best Telemark binding is the Meidjo 3.0. it's light, free pivoting and an excellent downhill binding that is the closest thing to 75 mm on the market. The catch is is that you need a a boot that fits the binding. This is a very expensive setup at about $1,400.

The free pivot Ascent should be just fine combined with physical fitness. Best wishes.

Personally I don't care about people climbing faster than me. My focus is on the feeling of enjoying the beauty of nature. I climb at the local resort where I am definitely the slowest one out there almost every time. But I'm out there on my Targas, Ultravector s and T4s because it's such a great feeling on the down. No NTN binding can match the feeling of connectedness with your ski and I have an NTN setup with free pivot on Waybacks. The NTN setup is significantly lighter than my 75 mm setup so I could absolutely climb faster with my NTN setup. I ski the Targas for the experience it gives me instead of the speed.

It's all a matter of personal preference and there's nothing wrong with wanting to go faster. I guess it might be different if I didn't climb solo and was with others.



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1508
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by Stephen » Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:30 pm

@bornaginalpiner, sent you a PM…



User avatar
telerat
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 7:09 am
Location: Middle of Norway
Ski style: Telemark, backcountry nordic and cross country skiing.
Favorite Skis: Any ski suitable for telemark or backcountry skiing, with some side-cut for turning.
Favorite boots: Scarpa plastic telemark. Asolo and Alfa leather boots.

Re: Light(er) weight tele

Post by telerat » Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:04 pm

A free pivot helps greatly I think. If the skin track is steep I find that the worse walk mode isn't as important as with a more low angle one where long strides are faster.

Regarding binding; I have used Voile Switchback and still has skis with them, but have since switched to NTN and Meidjo. Even though Meidjo skis better and is lighter, I could still ski 75mm boot with Switchback and be happy.

The Targa Ascent is a bit more dubious though.. A friend had those and was constantly plagued with icing and finally sold them, bought Switchback and was happy afterward. If you still will try the Ascent, check up on icing and prevention. I think the G3 Ascent looks nicer than Switchback, but function trumps looks. Sorry for the bad news.

Regarding boots; if you prefer Crispi they also had CX4/CXA and has the X-P model which are lower, softer and slightly lighter than your boot. That might be an alternative, but if buying both boots and binding new I'd look at NTN too.



Post Reply