Ingstad 205 vs 195

Real reviews by real skiers. What a concept! Add your own today. Reviews only please, questions can be posted as replies but new threads looking for opinions should be posted to the main Telemark Talk Forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Nitram Tocrut
XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Ski style: "Doorstep" backcountry skiing and groomed trails
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Europa 99 and Salomon Equipe 8
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska 75 mm
Occupation: Organic vegetable grower and many other things!

Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Nitram Tocrut » Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:16 pm

Not too sure if I should have posted that here or the general forum... but anyway I wanted to share my impressions on the Ingstad 205 vs 195 as it might help someone picking the right length.

I just got the 205 as a replacement for my 195 that had a small defect on one ski. Of course I could not resist the tentation of trying them despite our very thin snow cover. They are mounted on Voile 3 pins cable as opposed to a Voile Traverse on the 195.

First impression, they seem to be flatter than the 195 with a less pronounce camber (it is an impression, not an affirmation ;) ) That led me to think that they could be easier to weight when turning. I was actually right as I felt they were easier to turn despite the longer length. They really felt more stable than the 195 even without the cable. My back ski was less prone to « squirrel » around. I forgot to say that I am a novice telemarker but a seasoned XC skier. That was with the Alaska and I plan to try the T4 tomorrow and I am looking forward to it.

Second impression. You won’t be surprise if I say that it was such an improvement for the touring part. It is amazing the difference 10 cm can make. They kick better, they glide better and the fun is way better. I also have the impression that they will climb better. I am looking for even more improvement with the right was as I used blue but I should have used a slightly colder wax.

I am 6,1 and 205-210 pounds. On the Asnes site, for my height they recommend the 195 but there is no way I regret getting the 205 as a replacement. I have always skied long skis (I have 210 and 220 Europa99 and long groomed track skis) and I like this old way of thinking :D

User avatar
Danylewich
XCD Enthusiast
XCD Enthusiast
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:49 am
Location: Toronto, ON
Ski style: XC, BC, XCD, Alpine Touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Nansen
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska
Occupation: Vice-President at a Non-Profit
Website: http://www.righttoplay.com

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Danylewich » Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:28 pm

Similarly I got the FT62 at the longest length possible (188 cm, only three sizes available). At 6'1" and 170lbs, I was just on the low end of the Asnes recommendation for 188 and just from reading the charts the next size down would have seemed the better pick. But I think the 188 is perfect for me. Very similar experience with Nansen, I got too small, though I was hesitant and decided to downsize 5cm and it felt very small. My take on all this is to add 5cm to Asnes recommendations!

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk


User avatar
Woodserson
XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1456
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, and steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Favorite Skis: DH: Voile Objective & V6, Altai KOMs, XC: Asnes Gamme 54, Classy Woodies
Favorite boots: T4, Alaska
Occupation: Retro Rager-grouch

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Woodserson » Mon Dec 09, 2019 6:42 pm

Nitram Tocrut wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:16 pm

First impression, they seem to be flatter than the 195 with a less pronounce camber (it is an impression, not an affirmation ;) ) That led me to think that they could be easier to weight when turning.

Second impression. You won’t be surprise if I say that it was such an improvement for the touring part. It is amazing the difference 10 cm can make. They kick better, they glide better and the fun is way better. I also have the impression that they will climb better. I am looking for even more improvement with the right was as I used blue but I should have used a slightly colder wax.
First impression: I had a few pairs of Ingstads at one point in this house and I had one ski with a non-matching serial number with a lot less flex. I think the "flatter" ski you have in the 205 could be on a pair-by-pair basis and not the rule that the 205 is actually less cambered. There is variation of camber within the fleet. Regardless, you now have the optimum combination with less camber and the longer length.

Second impression: I believe this 100%. I got the 195 and I know the 205 will tour better. I am on the fence on doing a swap to the longer length for this reason.

User avatar
Johnny
XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1869
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, Objectives and all Asnes skis.
Favorite boots: ALFA Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Johnny » Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:55 am

Skis under 200cm are not real skis...
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."

User avatar
bgregoire
XCD KNIGHT
XCD KNIGHT
Posts: 1111
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99, Åsnes Ingstad & Cecilie, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar
Website: http://living-laponia.tumblr.com

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by bgregoire » Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:57 am

Johnny wrote:
Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:55 am
Skis under 200cm are not real skis...
Perhaps....when you are 6+ feet yourself.

So should we throw away our Rabbs and FT62 188s? I'll take 'em, thanks.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM

User avatar
Nitram Tocrut
XCD Pinhead
XCD Pinhead
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Ski style: "Doorstep" backcountry skiing and groomed trails
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Europa 99 and Salomon Equipe 8
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska 75 mm
Occupation: Organic vegetable grower and many other things!

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Nitram Tocrut » Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:13 am

bgregoire wrote:
Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:57 am
Johnny wrote:
Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:55 am
Skis under 200cm are not real skis...
Perhaps....when you are 6+ feet yourself.

So should we throw away our Rabbs and FT62 188s? I'll take 'em, thanks.
No way Benjamin... I already asked a couple of weeks ago for the 188 FT62 so I am first in line ;)

The 188 Rabbs are just fine for me so I assume the FT62 would be just great as well... I bought 172 FT62 for my wife so I am just waiting for her to try them first before I try them... or maybe I should not so the Asnes fever won’t strike again :lol:

User avatar
Cannatonic
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:07 pm

Re: Ingstad 205 vs 195

Post by Cannatonic » Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:03 pm

Skis under 200cm are not real skis...
[/quote]

So should we throw away our Rabbs and FT62 188s? I'll take 'em, thanks.
[/quote]

those aren't skis, they're actually dual snowboards :lol: :lol:
“The disciples are drawn to the high altars with magnetic certainty, knowing that a great Presence hovers over the ranges. You were within the portals of the temple....to enter the wilderness and seek, in the primal patterns of nature, a magical union with beauty”
1931 Ansel Adams

Post Reply