Biological Annihilation

This is the place to debate politics, global warming, and yes, even the origin of man, whatever. Simply put, if you want to argue about off topic stuff, you've found the right board. Have fun!
User avatar
twopass
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: Biological Annihilation

Post by twopass » Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:35 am

"I really have had enough of illogical detraction by association as a way of avoiding logical argument by an absurd extension of ad hominem argument to third parties."

User avatar
twopass
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: Biological Annihilation

Post by twopass » Thu Nov 19, 2020 5:26 pm

Scientists say net zero by 2050 is too late
Climate scientists now believe their predictions about the rate of the global temperature increase have been too conservative, and stronger and more decisive action is needed to reduce dangerous greenhouse gas emissions.

In this context, putting the emphasis on net zero emissions by 2050 simply helps the conservative parties, which are not moving away from their fossil fuel mates because the political pressure for change is not great enough.
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/sc ... 0-too-late
"I really have had enough of illogical detraction by association as a way of avoiding logical argument by an absurd extension of ad hominem argument to third parties."

User avatar
twopass
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: Biological Annihilation

Post by twopass » Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:18 am

"I really have had enough of illogical detraction by association as a way of avoiding logical argument by an absurd extension of ad hominem argument to third parties."

Post Reply