A couple years ago, Neptune said they could order anything from Asnes for me over the off-season and I could get it in the fall, don't know if they still do that, would be another option if you're not in a hurry. Obviously you'd be paying list price.
Too bad about the NATOs, Neptune is where I bought mine (under the former owners)
-Will Lange (quoting Inuit chieftan)
- XCD KNIGHT
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad BC; Asnes Gamme 54 BC; Asnes Storetind Carbon
- Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance BC; Alpina Alaska BC; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Thank you for giving this context.Roelant wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:33 amFor XC track skis there is significant variation between two pairs of the same length, for skis from any brand as far as I know.
It may be an artefact of production but there is not attempt to resolve it because the variation is considered useful.
In fact, in Norway, where most kids learn to cross country ski in kindergarten, it is considered imperative to have XC track skis matched to exactly your weight, so that the wax pocket is the correct length for your weight and technique.
Almost all sports shops worth their salt in Norway have equipment for loading skis and finding the effective length of a wax pocket under specific loads.
This is very true and very important. I weigh 178lbs and even my stiff 210cm Gamme 54 is easy to compress and get grip on soft BC snow. And its not just the need to pressure skis into turns- a BC ski with a true wax pocket is also miserable to climb a steep slope- and even the soft snow XC performance is challenging to engage the kick zone.I think there is no XCD ski which can provide me with a true wax pocket and still provide a fun downhill experience.
That would be cool!I can try to find time to drop by the sports shop and squeeze a few pairs of the same ski model to see if I notice a difference.
I examined the camber on my friend's 205cm Ingstad BC yesterday- it is in between the other two (i.e. the newest is the most cambered- my personal pair has the least). My personal pair is the least cambered- but it has hundreds more kilometres of hard skiing on it than the other two.
However- when I compress the camber on all three they feel like they have about the same resistance underfoot.
(And you know what is interesting- I think that the actual resistance underfoot between my Gamme 54s and Ingstad BC is actually very close...I think the big difference in performance between the Ingstad BC/Gamme 54 BC is not due to a difference in camber/stiffness underfoot, but due to the overall geometry and flex pattern being so different between the two skis.)
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
My thoughts are these:
Lovely ski overall.
Very sweet downhill even on the crust. Carved nicely and i love the rising tips. Feels safe. I have faceplanted om gamme...
Fast gliding, the skin in the last very wet day (only skin day) revealed a dry area of about 25-30 cm which i believe is the true pocket. Behind this the skin is wet. Comparison with the gammes in 200cm ridden by my girlfriend who is a little bit lighter than me revealed almost twice as Long dry area (highly scientific measurement of camber).
Greenwaxing the entire base worked fine in higher temperatures and made it possible to abstain from red wax which i assume is good for skins and general wellbeing.