narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
bgregoire
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99, Åsnes Ingstad & Cecilie, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by bgregoire » Fri Dec 13, 2019 10:39 am

Rodbelan wrote:
Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:32 am
You can't have the butter and the cul de la crémière...
Nicely put. I will take the butter any day.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM

User avatar
fisheater
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI
Occupation: Construction Manager

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by fisheater » Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:04 pm

Woods if you’re booting out out with the Rabb and Alaskas you are definately core. No further confirmation is required. You’re probably beyond core, the cool folks don’t even have a for your level of skiing Nirvana.
I on the other hand am not booting out on a more narrow Falketind, and a stiffer Ski March boot. I can only pay homage to your “core ness”.

User avatar
lowangle al
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:36 pm

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by lowangle al » Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:59 pm

Maybe Bob you are keeping your skis more in the fall line where they will be flater (and faster) and maybe Woods is sideslipping ;) Maybe you're the "core" one.

User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, Objectives and all Asnes skis.
Favorite boots: ALFA Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by Johnny » Fri Dec 13, 2019 2:28 pm

Aaaahhhhh....! That brings back a lot of good memories...!
I was a boot out king myself... Even with V-Risers... I used to make my own risers with 2x4 planks...

But hey, that was before I discovered the NNN-BC truth... You can carve like crazy with NNN, or ski the steepest slopes without any problem...

75mm is so passé... :lol:
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."

User avatar
Woodserson
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 1573
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, and steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Favorite Skis: DH: Voile V6, Altai KOMs, XC: Asnes Gamme 54, Classy Woodies
Favorite boots: T2Eco, T4, Alaska
Occupation: Retro Rager-grouch. Flailmeister. E99 Nerd

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by Woodserson » Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:26 pm

In my own mind, I am core. But Fish led me down this road of FT's, so he is the coreness at center of my core. LowAl's voice is in my head every turn-- "keep those feet further apart! transition across the fall line, not down it!"

EDIT: Actually, Fish... if you're not FALLING and booting out then you are actually MORE CORE because you've got it going on and you're dialed in. Sooooooo.... it sounds like you're bragging about your coreness and as such, the pedestal is still yours!

I am definitely skidding some of my turns when I'm booting out, Al's correct there, now I'll have more of this voice in my head.

Gddmm you guys!

Update: much better today with 10mm rise. Really happy with it!

User avatar
lowangle al
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:36 pm

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by lowangle al » Fri Dec 13, 2019 11:11 pm

I wasn't going to say it Woods, but since you brought it up. The other reason you may be booting out is that your knees are too close together. :) :)

User avatar
lilcliffy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2443
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad BC; Asnes Gamme 54 BC; Asnes Falketind 62;Asnes Storetind Carbon
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance BC; Alpina Alaska BC; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by lilcliffy » Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:41 pm

Thanks Woods for your update and reports on this thread-

I still prefer no riser on a Nordic touring ski less than 70mm on soft BC snow-

However- I can certainly see the benefits of a riser on a narrow ski when downhill skiing on consolidated snow (I assume that this is the reason Crister had the 3-pin Traverse on his FT62?)

Although I understand- and agree- with the principle and benefits of a wider (i.e. hip/shoulder-width) stance- I do not understand how a wider stance would lead to a less aggressive edging angle- and therefore, less chance for "booting out"- than a narrow stance where the skis are close together in the turn...

Please explain! :oops: :?:
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

User avatar
Cannatonic
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 896
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:07 pm

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by Cannatonic » Sun Dec 15, 2019 1:00 pm

Asnes Ingstad...Rottefella Super Telemark works great for me. no hablo riser.
"All wisdom is to be gained through suffering"
-Will Lange (quoting Inuit chieftan)

User avatar
lowangle al
XCD Guide
XCD Guide
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:36 pm

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by lowangle al » Sun Dec 15, 2019 5:37 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Sat Dec 14, 2019 8:41 pm


Although I understand- and agree- with the principle and benefits of a wider (i.e. hip/shoulder-width) stance- I do not understand how a wider stance would lead to a less aggressive edging angle- and therefore, less chance for "booting out"- than a narrow stance where the skis are close together in the turn...

Please explain! :oops: :?:
I think that with a wider the stance with both skis weighted it will make it harder to get your skis on a high angle, which causes boot out.

User avatar
lilcliffy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2443
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 7:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad BC; Asnes Gamme 54 BC; Asnes Falketind 62;Asnes Storetind Carbon
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance BC; Alpina Alaska BC; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: narrow xcd skis- to mount a riser or not- that is the question

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:59 pm

Oh- so you are talking about balance then? Meaning that a narrow stance leads to "boot out" because of loss of balance?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

Post Reply