introduction

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
merak
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:16 am
Location: Romania - Sibiu

Re: introduction

Post by merak » Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:10 am

I only do one day tours: climb up to 2200m then descent. The snow starts usually from 1500m. I have to walk from 500m = 1000m up to the snow pack.

During April and May the snow conditions are the same as in your picture: stabilised pack with a few centimetres melted on the surface.

User avatar
CIMA
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:01 pm
Location: Japan
Ski style: NNN-BC
Favorite Skis: Rossignol XP100
Favorite boots: Fischer BC GT
Occupation: Retired

Re: introduction

Post by CIMA » Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:25 am

merak wrote: During April and May the snow conditions are the same as in your picture: stabilised pack with a few centimetres melted on the surface.
Then you will have few problems with skiing on skinny skis with 3-pins and T4.
However, carrying crampons for T4 with you would be best bet. :-)
The flowing river never stops and yet the water never stays the same.



User avatar
merak
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:16 am
Location: Romania - Sibiu

Re: introduction

Post by merak » Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:43 am

No problems. T4 is mega for me and I use them with fat skis. Spring snow is the easiest when temps are above freezing and they usually are during day time.
I'm definitely sure Alaska 75 will be the best choice, just that it will be not that easy to buy.



User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: introduction

Post by Johnny » Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:27 am

Skiing in leather (or plastic) mountaineering boots is fucking hard.
Yeah...! That's why I was curious... I was once tempted by mountaineering gear before I tried tele... Last year I spent a day skiing with a pair of Koflach alpine leathers from the 50's, with old fixed-heel cable bindings... The vintage Rossi Alais Major must have been weighting 30 pounds... Wow, alpine leathers... Boy, that was fun...!!

Fucking hard = Freaking fun? 8-)

I personally like plastic boots a lot... For hard pack. It just a matter of taste... But if I had a playground like you guys, I would ski with leathers all the time and get rid of all my NTN gear... : )

I have to agree with you on the T4s, I didn't find them very comfy... But hey, to this day, I have yet to see a comfortable boot that fits my weird feet... I still preferred them over the Excursions though. What I did is putting the Excursion liners inside the T4... That was much better! (If you bought a pair of Excursions with T4 liners or vice-versa, they were mine...! : )
My favorite is the T2 Eco.
Oh, if I remember, it's also Ron's favorite boots... ;)
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2731
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: introduction

Post by lowangle al » Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:24 am

They are my favorite boots too, and if you don't buckle the top buckle they ski just like excursions, up and down.



User avatar
dschane
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:55 pm
Location: Juneau, AK

Re: introduction

Post by dschane » Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:59 pm

Clearly opinions vary. The T4 is 1490 grams; the T2 Eco is 1685. For me, the 200 grams savings isn't worth it. The T2s are more comfortable on the up and far better on the down. And when I want some light for mellow touring, I'll go with some leathers or even floppier stuff.

I know a very well accomplished mountaineer who's more of a climber than skier and having traveled over glaciers and up mountains on skis in plastic mountaineering boots, he's actually an impressive skier in those boots. For me, if there is going to be any decent decline, I'd take AT or tele boots before I attempt to make turns in mountaineering boots with a heavy pack on. And I'd probably shoot myself before I wear mountaineering boots, Silvretta bindings, and a 60 lb pack again -- that was pre-release hell. And besides, I have small kids now, so spending 18 days on a mountain, half of which is huddled in your tent waiting out the weather, is not in my foreseeable future.

Decent skis are so freakin' light these days (Countdown 102L from Down Skis, for example), I don't see the advantage that CIMA sees for taking skinny XCD skis up high in the mountains. Or maybe I misunderstood his post.

You can ski most anything in 3 pins and T4 (or T2 boots). It's just a matter of comfort and pleasure.



User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: introduction

Post by Johnny » Tue Apr 07, 2015 4:10 pm

Wow, those Down skis are pretty cool...! (A bit heavy for my taste though at 2800g...) Do you own a pair?

I think what CIMA means is that while most modern rando skis are indeed super-cool, they are a bit too fat to be skied with leathers or NNN on serious terrain... They require a sturdier boot to be controlled...

I know the T2 Ecos are cool, I was about to buy a pair a few years ago... Unfortunately, I then found a deal on T-Races... : )

Hey, did you buy some K'Booms for your kids yet? 8-)
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



User avatar
dschane
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:55 pm
Location: Juneau, AK

Re: introduction

Post by dschane » Tue Apr 07, 2015 4:55 pm

LoveJohnny wrote:Wow, those Down skis are pretty cool...! (A bit heavy for my taste though at 2800g...) Do you own a pair?

I think what CIMA means is that while most modern rando skis are indeed super-cool, they are a bit too fat to be skied with leathers or NNN on serious terrain... They require a sturdier boot to be controlled...

I know the T2 Ecos are cool, I was about to buy a pair a few years ago... Unfortunately, I then found a deal on T-Races... : )

Hey, did you buy some K'Booms for your kids yet? 8-)
Yes, I have a pair of the CD 102Ls. Excellent for touring. Any light ski brings compromises, but I'd say these are top of their class for fewest compromises. And great price for skis of this quality.

I have T Races too, which I picked up largely because as my kids have been growing, I've been spending more time skiing with them at the local ski hill. The increase in power and stability is addictive. I rarely hike with them, though I may try that to see how it feels.

My kids have all grown out of the K'boom skis. They were great for dinking around and getting an 18- to 30-month year old out and having fun on skis on snow, provided you have a near endless supply of hot chocolate. Between 30 and 40 months, they're ready for 70cm skis and bindings. My kids are now 6, 4, and 4, so they're on alpine and NNN. The oldest wants to learn telemarking next year, but we'll wait until he's not swimming in a size 23 boot. 1 or 2 years, probably.



User avatar
CIMA
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:01 pm
Location: Japan
Ski style: NNN-BC
Favorite Skis: Rossignol XP100
Favorite boots: Fischer BC GT
Occupation: Retired

Re: introduction

Post by CIMA » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:16 pm

If efficiency and practicality are only the issues in skiing high up in big mountains, I'd choose cutting-edge radonnee skis, carbon boots, feather-light TLT bindings. However, I still like frail NNN/SNS BC gear because it doesn't interfere much in my feeling while walking and skiing. I like such "naked" style. :-)

Image

Image

Image

Image
The flowing river never stops and yet the water never stays the same.



User avatar
dschane
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:55 pm
Location: Juneau, AK

Re: introduction

Post by dschane » Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:17 am

CIMA wrote:If efficiency and practicality are only the issues in skiing high up in big mountains,
And unless you're racing or going on a 2-month expedition, I don't know why one would whittle down the considerations to that. If you're having fun on your gear, you're doing it right.



Post Reply