Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
Krummholz
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 4:31 pm
Location: Middle Park, CO
Ski style: Ski trails uphill, Bcuz every trail here is uphill
Favorite Skis: Fischer SB-98, Rossi Alpineer 86, Fischer Europa 99, Altai Hok, Asnes USGI
Favorite boots: Looked and looked, then found true love - Alaska 75s. TN 75 for DH
Occupation: Transnordic Boot molder
https://telemarktalk.com/viewtopic.php? ... =40#p49595
Website: https://www.youtube.com/@KrummholzXCD

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Krummholz » Fri Jan 08, 2021 5:18 pm

That boot looks like a Frankenstein with all that stitching and plastic parts. Bet it will be coming undone after a year then it will be off to terrorize the villagers. Yes it has bolts sticking out. They should have a special sickly green color option.
Free Heeler - As in Free Spirit and Free Beer. No $700 pass! No plastic boots! And No Fkn Merlot!

User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4114
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by lilcliffy » Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:02 pm

I do think this is cool. I like new ideas and innovation.

From a skiing perspective, I do find myself struggling to see how this is better than NNNBC (or basic 3-pin NN) for Nordic ski touring...

Wasn't there supposed to be something on this new platform that created more binding resistance and/or reduced heel lift for downhill skiing?

What saves the skier from "going-over-the-handlebars" and the "rear-foot-tippy-toes" with this platform?

Am I missing something?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
fisheater
Posts: 2534
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI
Ski style: All my own, and age doesn't help
Favorite Skis: Gamme 54, Falketind 62, I hope to add a third soon
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska, Alico Ski March
Occupation: Construction Manager

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by fisheater » Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:16 pm

Gareth, it looks to me like the bumper is a pyramid centered under the toes. I still have the same questions Mr. Woodserson posed.
I guess if they would send boots and bindings to a couple of the guys here with terrain, snow, and a big quiver (for the ability to make comparisons), we would know soon enough. Heck if they really the shiznet, I would imagine there would be large demand for the initial release.
I’m not that guy, but I would be happy to offer Rottefella and Alfa good advice, for free, on the condition of complete anonymity.



User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by bgregoire » Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:09 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:02 pm
What saves the skier from "going-over-the-handlebars" and the "rear-foot-tippy-toes" with this platform?
Technique.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



User avatar
Tom M
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: Northwest Wyoming USA
Ski style: Skate on Groomed, XCD Off, Backcountry Tele
Favorite Skis: Fischer S-Bound 98 Off Trail, Voile V6 BC for Tele
Favorite boots: Currently skiing Alfa Vista, Alfa Free, Scarpa T2
Occupation: Retired
Website: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCam0VG ... shelf_id=1

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Tom M » Fri Jan 08, 2021 11:52 pm

Does anyone here know how the lever at the front of the binding works? Is it just a simple lock in / release for the pins on the boot? Does it shift or move the bumper to allow for a type of free pivot / downhill mode? Are the pins on the boot "fixed" or are they spring loaded, so that the pins go into the boot when inserting and out to lock the boot to the binding? Are those who have seen / skied the binding still under an NDA? Anyone here that has actually seen the prototype?



User avatar
Nick BC
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:04 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Ski style: Free heel Resort/Backcountry
Favorite Skis: Voile Vector BC,Trab Altavia and Hagan Ride 75
Favorite boots: Scarpa TX and T3
Occupation: Retired Community Planner

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Nick BC » Fri Jan 08, 2021 11:58 pm

I’m intrigued to know how well this concept will work. When I first looked at the rendering I thought it was a bumper to sit in front of the boot like NNN BC. However, thanks to Fish’s eagle eye, I looked again at the boot sole and realized it was under the front of the boot. I would love to try it. I learned on my Facebook feed that our good friend Christer from Asnes is testing it this season. The comment was that if it stands up to his skiing it’s good to go. :D



User avatar
Nick BC
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:04 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Ski style: Free heel Resort/Backcountry
Favorite Skis: Voile Vector BC,Trab Altavia and Hagan Ride 75
Favorite boots: Scarpa TX and T3
Occupation: Retired Community Planner

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Nick BC » Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:14 am

Tom, I suspect it is just like a tech binding in reverse, once you’re in you’re in with no adjustment. Maybe there is an uphill/lock in setting like tech bindings, but I suspect not, given the proposed usage. My thought is, after skiing TTS bindings, is that it could be a much more solid base for downhill. However, the $64k question, as others have mentioned, is the stiffness of the boot sole whilst allowing for stride and glide.

Anyway, kudos to Rottefella for coming up with something new. 😀



User avatar
Johnny
Site Admin
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Quebec / Vermont
Ski style: Dancing with God with leathers / Racing against the machine with plastics
Favorite Skis: Redsters, Radicals, XCD Comps, Objectives and S98s
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP, Alfa Guards, Scarpa TX Comp
Occupation: Full-time ski bum

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Johnny » Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:37 pm

I saw the thing. The details, the specs, the pictures, the official promotional stuff from Rottefella, videos, the 4 (!!!) upcoming new boots from Alfa... There will even be a limited edition Asnes XPLORE ski! But sadly I can't show you anything yet... It's still a secret...

Whether we like the XPLORE or not, this is pretty freaking exciting considering the potential impact on the XCD scene... Be patient... ISPO is only a few weeks from now... 8-)

265g Rottefella NNN-BC
265g Rottefella XPLORE
405g Voile 3-Pin Cable (No holy grail characteristics)
460g M Equipment Meidjo (ALL the holy grail characteristics + second heel)
500g Voile 3-Pin Cable Traverse
530g Rottefella Super Telemark with Cable
645g Voile 3-Pin Hardwire
726g Voile Switchback X2
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\
"And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."



User avatar
Redmountain
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:52 am

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by Redmountain » Sun Jan 10, 2021 5:48 am

Johnny wrote:
Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:37 pm
Whether we like the XPLORE or not, this is pretty freaking exciting considering the potential impact on the XCD scene... Be patient... ISPO is only a few weeks from now... 8-)

405g Voile 3-Pin Cable (No holy grail characteristics)
444g Rottefella NNN-BC
460g M Equipment Meidjo (ALL the holy grail characteristics + second heel)
500g Voile 3-Pin Cable Traverse
530g Rottefella Super Telemark with Cable
530g Rottefella XPLORE
645g Voile 3-Pin Hardwire
726g Voile Switchback X2
Exciting times, very exciting :)

Johnny, I think some of your binding weights are for a pair of bindings and some for one binding. Rottefella XPLORE is 530g/pair and 265g pr binding. Same with NNN BC, I'm quite sure NNN BC Magnum is 260 g pr binding.



User avatar
TeleMarcin
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:52 pm
Location: Saska Kępa, Warsaw, Poland

Re: Johnny, Pierre, and the beast. Or the new Telemark Tech Norm (TTN) vs the future of XCD (NTN-BC)

Post by TeleMarcin » Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:29 am

[quote=Johnny post_id=36063 time=1610213868 . There will even be a limited edition Asnes XPLORE ski! But sadly I can't show you anything yet... It's still a secret...
[/quote]

I thought about it :D and I am glad that Åsnes is bringing a new skis to complete Xplore bindings and boots. The type of skis (Ingstadt, Falketind 62, Rabb 68 or Nosi) will tell us a lot, what was in the mind of Rottefella, when constructing the whole system.

I always thought about our sport as a niche sport, and apparently Rottefella believes that it is big enough to develop the new system. Good for us!



Post Reply