Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and
I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.
I'd like to know what I would be doing.
What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.
yer fuked in the head there hillbilly. of all the things you could fantasize about one of the lemonparty here fisting themself? Cyrus and X-man sharing their fantasies or something?
Carl...how come you show up as soon as someone mentions masturbation ? I told ya before.....if ya leave it alone, it might grow !! _________________ "Take it from a member of the male species, walking around in public with an erection is somewhat of an embarrassment unless you are a bit..... off"........Bunion
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 3356 Location: The bull's eye
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject:
Laura wrote:
SteveK wrote:
Laura, what is it about my ass that fascinates you so?
That's funny. Once when I competed, I only had a worn-out speedo that was just for waterpolo over another suit. Unfortunately it was white. One of the girls on our team was waiting at the end of the pool with a towel for me.
Good thing it was the 50 free. _________________ I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed. Target practice, on the other hand . . .
Why is it so difficult for you to admit that many people wear ideological blinkers and that the more rigidly ideological their thinking, the more likely they are to be wearing those blinkers? You seem to have an aversion to admitting that - at least as it applies to left-wing ideologues. In fact, you seem to get antsy and defensive any time lefties are criticized. So I'll continue to do it.
You seem pissed that I don't take your paranoid delusions, err, hypothetical opinions and sweeping generalizations to heart. Do you really expect me to agree that "all conservatives are inherently violent" was seminal argument, when you can't even say that it was made, other than hypothetically?
Someone's hypothetical sweeping generalization about conservatives justify your sweeping generalizations about liberals? Is that about right? Of course I find that funny.
And around and around we go. Only now you won't even admit that sweeping generalizations about conservatives even occur - now they're only hypothetical. You're diseased.
You're like a broken record-- this trope of yours is not relevant to every copulating discussion. Get the fuck over it. You see "ideological blinkers" every time someone disagrees with you. You find it insightful to claim to have settled things by moaning about the same fucking thing over and over again. You wonder why it keeps coming up? Because you whine about it all the fucking time.
Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and
I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.
I'd like to know what I would be doing.
What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.
yer fuked in the head there hillbilly. of all the things you could fantasize about one of the lemonparty here fisting themself? Cyrus and X-man sharing their fantasies or something?
Carl...how come you show up as soon as someone mentions masturbation ? I told ya before.....if ya leave it alone, it might grow !!
mentione a lemonparty and pinchaloaf comes running
What the hell? So it OK to take the Lord's name in vain as long as it isn't your Lord, right hutguy?
How many Lords are there Laura?
lets see: Bushes, Reagan, Mitt, Milt
Friedman, Cheney, Rumsfeld ... ..They are
adding up fast ! Do you teach Sunday School
@ The First Church of The Totally Righteous
Conservative Mutha Fux , Laura ?
Do you splash the stupid in
place of holywater ? _________________ Speak and remove all doubt..
No one cares that you CAN'T tele!
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 3356 Location: The bull's eye
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:14 pm Post subject:
keithermadness wrote:
SteveK wrote:
Laura, what is it about my ass that fascinates you so?
It's asses in general, or more to the point, men's asses and what they leave in the shorts.
Now you've gone and done it - this one is going off the . . . tracks. _________________ I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed. Target practice, on the other hand . . .
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 3356 Location: The bull's eye
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject:
I'd respond with a pithy comeback, but I have to go do laundry. _________________ I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed. Target practice, on the other hand . . .
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All of the comments above are owned by the
poster, telemarktips.com is not responsible in any way for the
content. The views expressed by the posters are not necessarily
those of Tt.com, its management or owners. Ski safe, be happy,
rip it up, smile on your brother and sister!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
