:: View topic - Why Isn't Truther

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Why Isn't Truther
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Forum Index -> Way Off Topic Discussion

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

stevesliva

Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 10121
Location: SEA

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:36 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

They argue from these incidents that all conservatism is inherently violent (and that lefties, by contrast, are peaceful and loving).

Uhuh. A hyperbolic argument that hypothetical people are making hypothetical hyperbolic arguments.

Laura

Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 3994

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:41 pm Post subject:

hutguy wrote:

Christ Willy, you are slipping.

What the hell? So it OK to take the Lord's name in vain as long as it isn't your Lord, right hutguy?

hutguy

Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 7098
Location: Breckenridge CO

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:45 pm Post subject:

Laura wrote:

hutguy wrote:

Christ Willy, you are slipping.

What the hell? So it OK to take the Lord's name in vain as long as it isn't your Lord, right hutguy?

Would "Jesus Christ" be better? Or perhaps "Jesus H Christ"?

I'll tell you what Laura, if Jesus is out there somewhere listening in, I'm sure he can take it. Laughing

_________________
Creeds and doctrines are like a raft to get you to the other shore and then to relinquish. Neither cling to the raft or reject it when drowning. Even better, become a strong swimmer.

Shakyamuni Buddha. The diamond sutra

freeheelwilly

Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 8382
Location: on your nerves....

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject:

stevesliva wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

They argue from these incidents that all conservatism is inherently violent (and that lefties, by contrast, are peaceful and loving).

Uhuh. A hyperbolic argument that hypothetical people are making hypothetical hyperbolic arguments.

These aren't "hypothetical" incidents, idiot. Do a search on the Kentucky census worker, the Arizona shooter and the whacko in Norway. I'll wait here.

vdrifter11

Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 2034

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:11 pm Post subject:

Laura wrote:

hutguy wrote:

Christ Willy, you are slipping.

What the hell? So it OK to take the Lord's name in vain as long as it isn't your Lord, right hutguy?

???
Isn't the lord's name "lord" ?
I thought "ChristWilly" was another of Willy's handles..
Ahh, Christ! Laughing

_________________
Speak and remove all doubt..
No one cares that you CAN'T tele!

stevesliva

Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 10121
Location: SEA

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:23 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

stevesliva wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

They argue from these incidents that all conservatism is inherently violent (and that lefties, by contrast, are peaceful and loving).

Uhuh. A hyperbolic argument that hypothetical people are making hypothetical hyperbolic arguments.

These aren't "hypothetical" incidents, idiot. Do a search on the Kentucky census worker, the Arizona shooter and the whacko in Norway. I'll wait here.

It's your assertion. I'd find that people are arguing that "all conservatism is inherently violent" and no non-conservatives are? Suuuuure. Not going to waste my time looking for what's not there.

SteveK

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 3356
Location: The bull's eye

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:23 pm Post subject:

bobskiing wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and

I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.

I'd like to know what I would be doing.

Hypothetically speaking, of course.
_________________
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed. Target practice, on the other hand . . .

freeheelwilly

Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 8382
Location: on your nerves....

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject:

stevesliva wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

stevesliva wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

They argue from these incidents that all conservatism is inherently violent (and that lefties, by contrast, are peaceful and loving).

Uhuh. A hyperbolic argument that hypothetical people are making hypothetical hyperbolic arguments.

These aren't "hypothetical" incidents, idiot. Do a search on the Kentucky census worker, the Arizona shooter and the whacko in Norway. I'll wait here.

It's your assertion. I'd find that people are arguing that "all conservatism is inherently violent" and no non-conservatives are? Suuuuure. Not going to waste my time looking for what's not there.

Nice dodge.

Why is it so difficult for you to admit that many people wear ideological blinkers and that the more rigidly ideological their thinking, the more likely they are to be wearing those blinkers? You seem to have an aversion to admitting that - at least as it applies to left-wing ideologues. In fact, you seem to get antsy and defensive any time lefties are criticized. So I'll continue to do it.

freeheelwilly

Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 8382
Location: on your nerves....

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject:

SteveK wrote:

bobskiing wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and

I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.

I'd like to know what I would be doing.

What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.

skookumchuck

Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 9481
Location: Blue Canadian Rockies

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.

NTTAWWT

ghostofcarl

Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 6562

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

SteveK wrote:

bobskiing wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and

I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.

I'd like to know what I would be doing.

What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.

yer fuked in the head there hillbilly. of all the things you could fantasize about one of the lemonparty here fisting themself? Cyrus and X-man sharing their fantasies or something?

Laura

Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 3994

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:50 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

SteveK wrote:

bobskiing wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Chenman would be stoking it, Boohb, Boobskiing and Silly Nilly would be chiming in, and

I agree with you on this, Willy: Within the scope of your own imagination, my hypothetical reaction to a hypothetical discussion is exactly how you would construct it. By definition.

I'd like to know what I would be doing.

What you're always doing, Thevey: Sitting off to the side, fisting yourself.

I think Steve is a masochrist the way he teed that one up for you, FHW. I think he is off to the side getting his bottom spanked.

SteveK

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 3356
Location: The bull's eye

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:56 pm Post subject:

Laura, what is it about my ass that fascinates you so? _________________ I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed. Target practice, on the other hand . . .

stevesliva

Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 10121
Location: SEA

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Why is it so difficult for you to admit that many people wear ideological blinkers and that the more rigidly ideological their thinking, the more likely they are to be wearing those blinkers? You seem to have an aversion to admitting that - at least as it applies to left-wing ideologues. In fact, you seem to get antsy and defensive any time lefties are criticized. So I'll continue to do it.

You seem pissed that I don't take your paranoid delusions, err, hypothetical opinions and sweeping generalizations to heart. Do you really expect me to agree that "all conservatives are inherently violent" was seminal argument, when you can't even say that it was made, other than hypothetically? Laughing

Someone's hypothetical sweeping generalization about conservatives justify your sweeping generalizations about liberals? Is that about right? Laughing

Of course I find that funny.

freeheelwilly

Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 8382
Location: on your nerves....

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:07 pm Post subject:

stevesliva wrote:

freeheelwilly wrote:

Someone's hypothetical sweeping generalization about conservatives justify your sweeping generalizations about liberals? Is that about right? Laughing

Of course I find that funny.

And around and around we go. Only now you won't even admit that sweeping generalizations about conservatives even occur - now they're only hypothetical. You're diseased.

Display posts from previous:

	Forum Index -> Way Off Topic Discussion	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 2 of 3

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Dr. Telemark (reviews, etc.) | Forum Guidelines | Search | Legal/Terms of Use

All of the comments above are owned by the poster, telemarktips.com is not responsible in any way for the content. The views expressed by the posters are not necessarily those of Tt.com, its management or owners. Ski safe, be happy, rip it up, smile on your brother and sister!