| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jellero

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 6382 Location: Ironton, Boyne City, Charlevoix, East Jordan, Salida
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:04 pm Post subject: Nice day for an uncontrolled burn... |
|
|
why would these morons do a "controlled" burn during windstorms? on a hot, extremely dry time of year.
i answered my own question with the word moron. i think it was sunday i burned some garden debris, in a barrel, early in the day, with a garden hose right there along with me and a rake. we have been having bad winds in colorado for some time, man it's spring and it is windy in spring in colorado. if it isn't windy at 8:00, it will be by 10:00. these people are suppose to be pros, they technically are pros as this is their job but this was just stupid. j |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmiller
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1174 Location: BV CO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The burn was several days prior.
Things can smolder for months.
Controlled burns have prevented many fires from becoming much larger.
Controlled burns are good.
Monday morning quarterbacking is not.
Shit happens. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hacksaw
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 3528 Location: Golden CO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Controlled burns are a lot like avalanche control work.
Once you start them (i.e. light the dry brush or light the bomb) you have no idea of how big a result you may get.
So obviously, doing this kind of "control work" needs to be done VERY carefuly and under the right conditions. _________________ "Its all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then its a sport."
- - - - - - |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifreeK
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 11426
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I put up some comments about this on the Dust thread over on the Happy Site the other day. Heard a blurb on 9 News that it was the driest in 130 years for this time of year on the front range. Haven't seen anything else to back that up.
It's dry over here on the west side and getting drier, still a lot of ditch and field burning going on. The local crew has rolled out on a few with good results so far. This is starting to look and feel a bit like '76-'77.
We've had smolders in duff take off a week or more after the last lightning events. So yeah, once the fire gets in the roots and deep in the duff there's no way of knowing for sure it's all out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmiller
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1174 Location: BV CO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hacksaw wrote: | Controlled burns are a lot like avalanche control work.
Once you start them (i.e. light the dry brush or light the bomb) you have no idea of how big a result you may get.
So obviously, doing this kind of "control work" needs to be done VERY carefuly and under the right conditions. |
In general, those guys have a pretty good idea of where it's going.
How many controlled burns do you suppose have been conducted in the last few decades? How many massive out of control fires have been prevented?
The problem we have now is too few fires in our history. Gonna take a real long time to get things even close to "natural"
Does this suck? Of course. But I'm not about to call them morons. Those guys and gals work their asses off. I'd like to see jellero call them that to their face. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellero

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 6382 Location: Ironton, Boyne City, Charlevoix, East Jordan, Salida
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it was the wrong time to light any kind of fire and they should have known better. i am not talking about all controlled burns all the time. the fact that smoldering pockets can ignite when the wind comes up for days later is another good point. they shouldn't have done it, period, because it is windy almost every day this time of year and it was/is extraordinarily dry. it wasn't like they had to do this right away, it will eventually rain and the wind will calm down, THEN do the burn. j |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmiller
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1174 Location: BV CO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jellero wrote: | | it was the wrong time to light any kind of fire and they should have known better. i am not talking about all controlled burns all the time. the fact that smoldering pockets can ignite when the wind comes up for days later is another good point. they shouldn't have done it, period, because it is windy almost every day this time of year and it was/is extraordinarily dry. it wasn't like they had to do this right away, it will eventually rain and the wind will calm down, THEN do the burn. j |
By your logic there would never be any burns. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifreeK
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 11426
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bmiller wrote: |
The problem we have now is too few fires in our history. Gonna take a real long time to get things even close to "natural"
|
They've been letting some go the last few years to try and move a bit in that direction. Here's a lightning start from last August they let burn itself out over a week or so. Wasn't a problem except for when the wind put you at the end of the chimney. Embers didn't seem to be a problem, but they were on a lot of people's minds.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jw

Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 6325 Location: Nevada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
amazing how many days things can ignite or re-ignite when high winds and dry conditions are added... this is just the start.. could be a gnarly summer in the west even if there are no controlled burns. This will hopefully open some eyes amongst the various public land agencies for the upcoming fire seasons.
Sad for the homeowners for sure. _________________
| wow wrote: | | Complexity adds confusion whether you are in charge of an avalanche center or headed out for the first tour. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifreeK
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 11426
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does anyone have any experience with these sort of home foam units? There's a number on the market, this link is just one example.
http://consumerfireproducts.com/?page_id=5
Back in '95 when I started mixing slurry at the tanker base, we had a training week at fire school up in Leadville. At one point, they had us step outside the school building. A guy pulled up on an atv a small flatbed trailer. Using a SCBA tank for air pressure, and about 20 gallons of water, he reeled off some hose and lathered the two story side of the building with foam in a couple of minutes. It was a demonstration for quick response, small, portable foam units for urban interface issues. Made a real impression on me, though I've never gone any further with it here at home. Our plan is: stay safe, let it burn, rebuild....though of course we very much prefer it never come to that.
Always thought there might be an way to design these foam units to be automated and preset during fire season. No one should ever loose their life or be injured saving a thing, imho. If a person could retreat to safety and perhaps have a radio or other automated trigger for a foam unit perhaps more buildings in urban interface areas could be protected with risking fewer people?
Thoughts, experience? Should insurance companies be encouraging these sort of systems? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmiller
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1174 Location: BV CO
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know much about those systems but they have been around for a long time. What's the shelf life of the foam?
Defensable space and non combustable exterior finishes are pretty effective. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hutguy

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 7137 Location: Breckenridge CO
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jellero wrote: | | it was the wrong time to light any kind of fire and they should have known better. i am not talking about all controlled burns all the time. the fact that smoldering pockets can ignite when the wind comes up for days later is another good point. they shouldn't have done it, period, because it is windy almost every day this time of year and it was/is extraordinarily dry. it wasn't like they had to do this right away, it will eventually rain and the wind will calm down, THEN do the burn. j |
As mentioned Jellero, I'm not 100% sure on what the timeline was but the prescribed burn was quite a few days maybe even a week before the windstorm hit. Conditions were within guidelines when they did the burn. The parameters they have to meet for prescribed burns are pretty strict but nothing is 100% foolproof.
That said, they're not 100% sure it was a post burn flare up although they seem to think that's probably what it was. It is possible that it was something else. They won't know for sure until the thing is cooled down enough for them to do a proper investigation. _________________ Creeds and doctrines are like a raft to get you to the other shore and then to relinquish. Neither cling to the raft or reject it when drowning. Even better, become a strong swimmer.
Shakyamuni Buddha. The diamond sutra |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellero

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 6382 Location: Ironton, Boyne City, Charlevoix, East Jordan, Salida
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i don't know the exact timeline either but it is march. can't remember more than 1-2 days all month that it hasn't been windy. i've made my point, that it showed poor judgement to do the burn at that time and which day is immaterial. bmiller, are you saying it was a good idea? not sure what your point is. j |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmiller
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1174 Location: BV CO
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm saying controlled burns in general are a very good idea.
I'm not sure what the point of this thread was. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifreeK
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 11426
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bmiller wrote: |
Defensable space and non combustable exterior finishes are pretty effective. |
Yep. Went with a concrete tile roof, twice the cost of asphalt shingles 30 years ago but good for a couple of lifetimes and fire proof. Even in this harsh summer solar environment it shows no signs of wear or aging....unlike the guy who put it up there.
Also used old school concrete based stucco for siding, but also have a wood deck and overhang which I consider kindling and wick but don't want to do without them.
Started out with a wide defensible space, but things have grown up with the concentration of runoff from the roof and such and dang but the shade it great. So, it's a bit of a compromise between best practice and practicality in use.
With high winds swirling w/micro burst during a summer afternoon dry lightning storm flames and embers can travel a long way fast. That's the worst case scenario...dry popcornfart lightning storm with winds. I've put out three or four trees over the years and was always lucky that a deluge came with the lightning strikes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|