| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lamarched
Joined: 18 Sep 2011 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:11 pm Post subject: NTN advice |
|
|
I've been skiing an NTN rig (blues on 4) on 174 BD Machines and Garmont Prophets. It's been pretty good this season, enjoying the step in qualities and the new boot.
I made the mistake of trying a friend's Havocs, T1s, and BD 02s. It was way more responsive, felt less mushy searching for the edge, and overall had more control.
Any suggestions? I'd like to learn to finesse the current setup. I'm leaning toward blaming the move from a super stiff ski to a relatively soft ski. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 1686 Location: North Ogden, Ut or upstate NY
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You've just had firsthand experience of comparing NTN with REAL telemark bindings.  _________________ You know it's a good day when you wake up in the morning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3PinGrin
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 951 Location: between fens and potholes
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't be fooled, Jim can't NTN.
Mushy is not the word I would use for the NTN system. Are you within the recommended weight range with the springs/settings? How is the fit on your boots compared to your friends T1s. The machine is not described as an especially soft ski. _________________ "Throw you in the pigpen, and you come out vice president of the hogs." Burt Lancaster |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Whitehonky

Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 5403 Location: Between Sea and Sky
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here we go.... _________________ "It's a strange world made up of extreme horizontal and vertical planes. Where you find diagonal, you find skiing."
~Chad Sayers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 1686 Location: North Ogden, Ut or upstate NY
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 3PinGrin wrote: | | Don't be fooled, Jim can't NTN. |
So true. I tele.  _________________ You know it's a good day when you wake up in the morning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rip

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 168 Location: SLC
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim wrote: | | 3PinGrin wrote: | | Don't be fooled, Jim can't NTN. |
So true. I tele.  |
Hmmm....I doubt it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 6978 Location: Castle Rock, CO
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO the Prophets and the T-1 are not going to be all that different. NTN set on blue 4 is going to feel a lot different then an 02 but the difference would not be described as mushy or less responsive. A Havoc is an average ski that I think is a bit plankish or sluggish and the Machines are stiff as hell and I have no intention of ever skiing them.
It is really hard to say what is causing you problems but I think it is the stiffer ski.
What level of skier are you and how much race type carving experience do you have. I think a strong skier with a good carving back ground could rail trenches on NTN and Machines but would not like having to slide or pivot them around doing quick turns or bumps.
I am not sure the Machine is a finesse ski. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QuiverQueen
Joined: 22 Apr 2005 Posts: 3254 Location: Boulder
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, "mushy" and "NTN" are not two words I would ever use in the same sentence. Or same paragraph.
Really not sure what's leading to your conclusions - James could be onto something.
Mushy and NTN...I don't think so.
(Hey Soulman, better post quick! ) _________________ A humble student at Fryingpan University. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lamarched
Joined: 18 Sep 2011 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tried the recommended settings and ended up adjusting them for more activity. My background is all mountain, no racing. Prefer lots of turns to ripping, but money is tight and I got the machines for a song.
The fit on the T1s was tight to the point of cutting off circulation after about ten minutes. My prophet fit is much better and actually usable for a full day.
Figured I would throw it out to you folks, thanks for the response. Going to guess that it's simply the stiffer ski combined with an actual fitting boot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaHeel

Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 1835 Location: I Heart Beaver!
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wait for it......Dobish reference coming soon. _________________ No one cares you stayed for the summers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silow
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mushy garmont prophet toe box ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dobish

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 3369 Location: Castilo de Dobish, Golden CO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IDSKI
Joined: 25 Dec 2009 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In my opinion the garmont prophet is a crap boot. I cant stand to ski in mine and have switched back to my crispi evos. The prophet just has very little edge control vs the evo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MSU Alum

Joined: 14 Oct 2009 Posts: 329 Location: Utah
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's more likely that it's the skis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hdiddy

Joined: 05 Mar 2008 Posts: 4091 Location: SF, CA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:18 am Post subject: Re: NTN advice |
|
|
| lamarched wrote: | I've been skiing an NTN rig (blues on 4) on 174 BD Machines and Garmont Prophets. It's been pretty good this season, enjoying the step in qualities and the new boot.
I made the mistake of trying a friend's Havocs, T1s, and BD 02s. It was way more responsive, felt less mushy searching for the edge, and overall had more control.
Any suggestions? I'd like to learn to finesse the current setup. I'm leaning toward blaming the move from a super stiff ski to a relatively soft ski. |
How long are the skis and how heavy are you?
Also, how long were the havocs? _________________ Drive the cuff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|