| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
telewoman
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 457 Location: Mt. Shasta
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lochsa
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 2002 Location: aqui y alli
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yep, a good narrative. Lots of lessons in there; it expresses well the narrowing of vision, the failure of one's own mind and body to cooperate under stress,how 'having skied the backcountry for thirty years' can mean very little at times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tOMfLOUNDER
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 550 Location: Clements, California
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for posting, thoughts & prayers to friends & family.
All the best, tOM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevesliva
Joined: 11 Dec 2004 Posts: 10285 Location: SEA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Crap.
But we need to know what beacon he had. Or maybe it was just the batteries. Which you can warm up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lochsa
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 2002 Location: aqui y alli
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stevesliva wrote: | Crap.
But we need to know what beacon he had. Or maybe it was just the batteries. Which you can warm up. |
it was interesting how long it took him to realize he could use the other skier's beacon . . . and how he didn't know how once he had it. Experience with many different kinds of beacons besides one's own could be very useful (and new batteries). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shan
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2194 Location: right behind you!
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
yikes  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seki
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 6386 Location: Gone
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sobering.
Thanks for posting, telewoman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fogey
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 475 Location: Foot of Claremont Canyon
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey Telewoman--you might want to edit the title to give a more specific idea what this thread's about--this is one of the most interesting and useful first-hand avalanche accounts I've seen. Thanks for the link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt J

Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 2640
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
truly a tragedy
having heard first hand accounts of someone who has experienced a full burial I think these narratives are sobering and informative
I think of my buddy's story whenever we're deciding whether a slope is safe or not
it's important to know that no matter which side of a burial you're on it's truly harrowing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkstar
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 27 Location: central ny
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:30 pm Post subject: wow... |
|
|
i shuddered reading that account _________________
"Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after." - Thoreau |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scaramouch
Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 444 Location: out there somewhere
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scary. It strikes me that there should be some kind of standard for transceivers, so that anybody can use anybody else's beacon. _________________ Little merry violets,
Little merry beetle shadows,
Another sunlight in antique jars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick (AT)
Joined: 12 Dec 2004 Posts: 3140 Location: A Brit on the Columbia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| scaramouch wrote: | | Scary. It strikes me that there should be some kind of standard for transceivers, so that anybody can use anybody else's beacon. |
There IS a standard for beacons. But it does not say anything about the user interface. And I find it hard to imagine one ever being agreed that does. The standard was written back in the days of analogue beacons and if it covered the user interface then directional arrows, distance readouts and multiple search functions would all be non-compliant. _________________ Nick (AT)
We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this is not for lack of trying. (Douglas Adams) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
risk.reduction

Joined: 22 Apr 2008 Posts: 3062 Location: Wasilla, Alaska
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or, how about not triggering avalanches in the first place? Terrain suitable for the conditions.... _________________ "Well, I sure don't know what I'm going for...but I'm gonna go for it, for sure." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weakknees
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 107 Location: Polson MT here we come
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hutguy

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 7138 Location: Breckenridge CO
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
As heart wrenching as first hand narratives like this are, IMO they are some of the best teaching tools available. You can go back over them and point out the mistakes made in real world situations and show how easy it is to find yourself in a dicey situation.
As RR pointed out, , best is not getting yourself in a situation like this i the first place, no doubt that's the best option, but as we all know, getting yourself into a bad spot can happen to anyone, especially if you let your guard down or don't listen to your inner alarm. _________________ Creeds and doctrines are like a raft to get you to the other shore and then to relinquish. Neither cling to the raft or reject it when drowning. Even better, become a strong swimmer.
Shakyamuni Buddha. The diamond sutra |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|