Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Paul Parker interview
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Telemark Talk Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ghostofcarl



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 6613

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thornton wrote:
ghostofcarl wrote:
Danno wrote:
coulda fooled us. Laughing


that's not hard


u mean hardside, right?


no, sodo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elias



Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nurse Ben wrote:
In contrast to BD 01, 7TM, or Hammerheads, of which I have never had a single breakage issue...


Elias wrote:
How many seasons on the Hammerhead with no breakages before NTN?

How many years on the O1 and 7tm?


Nurse Ben wrote:
in response to your question: 2, 2, 2


Thanks for finally answering at least part of my question. That wasn't so hard now was it? Confused

You claim to have skied a total of six years on the three different binding models prior to NTN. Two years on the Hammerhead, two years on 7tms, and two years on the O1, all without any breakage or pullouts.

If true, it does indeed sound like your binding problems began with NTN, and that you had significant experience on three models of bindings prior to your bad luck with NTN.

One thing I'm still not clear on. When exactly did you start telemarking in plastic boots and modern bindings? Your NTN problems began at the start of the 2007/2008 season, subtract six ski seasons and you would have had to have started telemarking at least as far back as the 2001/2002 season. Is this right or did you start even earlier?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Danno



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 11179
Location: People's Republic of A**holia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

counting someone's gear experience by years seems odd. Shouldn't you be considering number of days on the gear (even if that too is inexact, as we've learned that some of us don't really tour when we tour Wink)?
_________________
"anecdotes are fine assbaggery is not"
"But of course to Telemark is just one function of ski gear, but to have fun is the other. If I so much want to make Parallel turns all day long, I shall do this as well"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was thinking to myself.... aren't you harder on your bindings if you ski at the resort all day than if you were touring on them?

i.e. my 60+ days of resort on NTN puts the binding through the paces far more than someone touring on them for 60+ days - assuming advanced terrain is skied.
_________________
Drive the cuff


Last edited by hdiddy on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nstelemark



Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1922
Location: Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Danno wrote:
counting someone's gear experience by years seems odd. Shouldn't you be considering number of days on the gear (even if that too is inexact, as we've learned that some of us don't really tour when we tour Wink)?


Personally (and I know I am clearly in the minority here Twisted Evil ) for some reason I can ski more vert lifted served than touring in a day, can't seem to see why.

So lets say y'all can do 5,000 feet in a day, I usually ski about 10,000+ feet in a day lift served, so something tells me I am putting more miles on the gear than those who tour but what do I know Shocked . Or put another way my 50 days is worth 100 BC days.

From what I can tell y'all are Greg Hill doing 10,000 feet a day for a 100 days. I am impressed!
_________________
Larry
----------------------------------------------------
NTN is all about Dynamic Performance™
Came for the stoke, stayed for the popcorn.
Tele boot fitting - http://www.nstelemark.com/NSTelemark/Telemark_Boot_Fitting.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Danno



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 11179
Location: People's Republic of A**holia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hdiddy wrote:
I was thinking to myself.... aren't you harder on your bindings if you ski at the resort all day than if you were touring on them?

i.e. my 60+ days of resort on NTN puts the binding through the paces far more than someone touring on them for 60+ days - assuming advanced terrain is skied.


good point, that's a further consideration. Although when considering breakage to the touring mechanism, I suspect that we're harder on that when touring. Wink
_________________
"anecdotes are fine assbaggery is not"
"But of course to Telemark is just one function of ski gear, but to have fun is the other. If I so much want to make Parallel turns all day long, I shall do this as well"


Last edited by Danno on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jinx: NST owes me a beer! Wink
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clydesdad



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 425
Location: Tahoe Paradise

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, thirty pages has been acheived...Perhaps it's time to let this one die...

And diddy, there you go again, showing your resort skiing bias!!

Remember, people are coming here looking for gear advice....or something...

And, finally, (after my first thirty page NTN thread where I actually read it all....) I will be keeping a detailed record of my days/hours/minutes/seconds, not to mention vertical feet, of every moment on skis, cross referenced, of course, by the gear I'm on, which I will be sure to include with any posts I might make....

And, if, god forbid, I can't get out, or I don't have time to post, I know I can count on other Ttipsters to share their TRs and gear experiences with me through the wonder of the interweb....

Because, for me, I FEEL like I've skied, when I read about and see pictures of other people skiing....

I.E., MORE STOKE PLEASE!!!

....And, at the moment, I really need to get out....so like VT said: Arrow

Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew L



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 1775

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think these were soulsuckingNTNs.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nurse Ben



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 4563
Location: Riding my unicycle

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

delete
_________________
Hi Mom!


Last edited by Nurse Ben on Sun Oct 24, 2010 4:32 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
half-fast skier



Joined: 21 Mar 2010
Posts: 574
Location: rancho d'lux

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew L wrote:
I think these were soulsuckingNTNs.



gotta ask: what are those terraces in the background?
_________________
Certified
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cesare



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 13194
Location: People's Republic

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Avalanche mitigation fences.
_________________
that sounds like a sure-fire way to get bitch-slapped by devil's club -- dschane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew L



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 1775

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cesare wrote:
Avalanche mitigation fences.


Um, they're artificial pillow lines. Stoopid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skibum



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2370
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkymonday wrote:
Tele.



Breeze.


Yea, their idea seems great. One ski/binding for two boots.

I know I tend to love one the way one pair of boots fits and pick my ski/binding of the day around that pair of boots. Since those aren't NTN, my NTN skis sit on the roof rack most of the time. With Garmont's new parallel boot lines looking like nearly the same boot with different toes, it just seems like it would be great to have one boot for both binding systems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cesare



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 13194
Location: People's Republic

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andrew L wrote:
cesare wrote:
Avalanche mitigation fences.


Um, they're artificial pillow lines. Stoopid.

Earth to Meekus, I knew it was a pillow line. I just didn't get it at first.

_________________
that sounds like a sure-fire way to get bitch-slapped by devil's club -- dschane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Telemark Talk Forum All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 30 of 31

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




 

Dr. Telemark (reviews, etc.) | Forum Guidelines | Search | Legal/Terms of Use

All of the comments above are owned by the poster, telemarktips.com is not responsible in any way for the content. The views expressed by the posters are not necessarily those of Tt.com, its management or owners. Ski safe, be happy, rip it up, smile on your brother and sister!