| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trackhead
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2518 Location: Following Maynard
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gargle and spit.
Is it impossible for anything constructive to come out of this, or are some too busy stroking and choking on their own egos?
Thanks for the recount, Wow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baaahb

Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 15772 Location: Ponderosa
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
glad yer ok!
(relative to the alternative) _________________ Other vegetables have a hard time competing with potatoes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifishbum

Joined: 20 May 2005 Posts: 234 Location: An LSD Steakhouse somewhere in the Wasatch
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| staph infection wrote: | Skifishidiot wrote:
| Quote: | | Wouldn't be the interwebz without somebody c-wording things up with arguing. |
or did he write:
| Quote: |
copulate Hawaii over priced and full of tweakers and marginal skiing. I'm trying to take my cue from the midnight brewing company out of Anchorage AK |
Oh that's right it's the internet?!
|
could have sworn there was a winky thrown in that hawaii comment and you must of missed the obs and avvy photos but this idoit apriacaiates your input  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
powderdave

Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 269
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's humbling and instructive when folks like OAG and Wow talk about their mistakes. Makes me take a step back when guys like that can get caught.
SFB, narrow concave coolies probably provide compressive support, but it's not a theory I've been too game to test in questionable conditions. Strapping those monster fatties on your feet probably keeps you from tickling buried weak layers, maybe that's your secret. However, good results in snowpits can steer you wrong sometime. Several years ago, McCammon and Sharaf wrote an article on the importance of assessing structure when making decisions. They saw avalanches occurring despite good results showing a strong snowpack, thus providing the impetus for their studies.
On Sunday, we were standing atop Wilson when DK and crew dropped into Alexander. A pit in Solider revealed terrible structure so we pulled the plug, I didn't do a single test. In my book, bad structure trumps tests showing strength. At some point you may make decisions Colorado-style and figure the upper snowpack is bridging the bad stuff. I'm not smart enough to know when that happens. Chris with UDOT once told me that people get into trouble when they try to outsmart the snowpack. And, as Homemadesalsa says, if you're gonna break the rules, you better have science on your side. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
powderpond
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 2014 Location: Salt lake City
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What aobut the 3rd slide? Judging from where those guys were, and the fact they didn't tell us about it when we saw them at three, I am guessing it went off at about 3:30. Maybe some heat contributing ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skifishbum

Joined: 20 May 2005 Posts: 234 Location: An LSD Steakhouse somewhere in the Wasatch
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^^ strong post PD thanks. Slightly of topic as it isn't millcreek
my feelings on Sat. incident on Kessler. We had planned on summiting Kessler and checking conditions on the E ramp.
Had one partner on time constraints. The minute we got off the argenta headwall ridge onto that w SW aspect instabilities were imediately felt collapsing and shearing q1 at ground facets on the shallow 2' snowpack of ridge. Avvy hairs on the back of our necks stood up and trail breakers tried hard to stay on ridge minimalizing exposure.
The pit digger had hoped to possibly ski that W aspect so digging a pit in that location seemed logical. Where as our party wanted off that aspect as quickly and safely as possible. I cant say if me being 70' above him on the skin track was the trigger but I felt the collapse and saw the slide break 50' below me. Luckily he was near a stand of trees and didn't go for a ride into mineral or get burried/ trapped against a tree any deeper.
Definately some group dynamics involved.
After the slide we debated our further actions. No one in the group liked the snowpack in the argenta headwall so the descision to press on and check out the East ramp or possibly decent down shoulder of GLM/Argenta.
Pit results in he east ramp were decent and no further colapsing or
instablities were felt so we skied down with a spotter on the subridge behind trees.
Just an idiots $.02 on that incident take it for fwiw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
powderpond
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 2014 Location: Salt lake City
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No SFB I am talking about tom d report of the third slide on or about gobs that day. My thoughts were maybe not enough sun to melt but maybe enough heat to expand some and erode stability,
No time of avalanche given.
http://utahavalanchecenter.org/avalanche_gobblers_knob_272010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hawkeye1980
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 Posts: 54 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Approximately what angle are the skied slopes in the panoramic picture? I have no avy knowledge but trying to learn.
Glad you're ok. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peteMimmack

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| powderpond wrote: | No SFB I am talking about tom d report of the third slide on or about gobs that day. My thoughts were maybe not enough sun to melt but maybe enough heat to expand some and erode stability,
|
The report shows that the weather is still cloudy, and it mentions that the 3rd skier hit a spot that was "steeper" then where the first 2 skied. So, I'm thinking it was just a "location" issue: third skier compressed a spot that was weak enough and steep enough to go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dakotakid
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 706 Location: Thalt Lake Thity
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| powderdave wrote: |
On Sunday, we were standing atop Wilson when DK and crew dropped into Alexander. A pit in Solider revealed terrible structure so we pulled the plug, I didn't do a single test. In my book, bad structure trumps tests showing strength. At some point you may make decisions Colorado-style and figure the upper snowpack is bridging the bad stuff. I'm not smart enough to know when that happens. Chris with UDOT once told me that people get into trouble when they try to outsmart the snowpack. And, as Homemadesalsa says, if you're gonna break the rules, you better have science on your side. |
Great post Dave. Structure over strength every time. I don't feel comfortable knowing when the bridging is strong enough either. We were not comfortable skiing big, committing, open lines. We thought we could safely ski in the big trees and pick our way down. As can be seen in the UAC photos, we screwed up by entering the trees way too far to the skiers left to catch the intended lower angle line outlined in red to the skiers right. Big mistake #1. We knew we were in the wrong place and should have put on the climibing skins instead of skiing the line. Big mistake #2. There are many more mistakes in logic and communication dynamics which we will be going through and hopefully learning from for quite some time. Constructively, I hope this is the last such punishment required to learn the lesson. I thought the Catholic school nuns were hard with the corporal punishment. Thanks for your post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danno

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 11216 Location: People's Republic of A**holia
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reading wastach-related threads sometimes feels like a much more mean-spirited version of the Clinton Jah Brethren thread. Equally as incomprehensible, but people are clearly not friendly to each other.  _________________ "anecdotes are fine assbaggery is not"
"But of course to Telemark is just one function of ski gear, but to have fun is the other. If I so much want to make Parallel turns all day long, I shall do this as well" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keithermadness

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 24806
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Danno wrote: | Reading wastach-related threads sometimes feels like a much more mean-spirited version of the Clinton Jah Brethren thread. Equally as incomprehensible, but people are clearly not friendly to each other.  |
Good thing you have actual experience in the Wasatch and know first hand this is not true. Don't believe everything you read on the intranets.
 _________________ ~km
"Everyday is a potential avalanche day."
-Missiongravity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cesare

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 13225 Location: People's Republic
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good to hear you are ok, Bob. Since I am still recovering from my latest dalliance with narcotics, I am just going to say take care of that shoulder now. You don't want to end up like me. _________________ that sounds like a sure-fire way to get bitch-slapped by devil's club -- dschane |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
icelanticskier
Joined: 08 Dec 2009 Posts: 242 Location: newmarket, nh
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:35 pm Post subject: KEITHERMINDLESSNESS |
|
|
| keithermadness wrote: |
Good thing you have actual experience in the Wasatch and know first hand this is not true. Don't believe everything you read on the intranets.
|
if i didn't have wasatch experience, and a fair bit of it (i used to spend some winters there) i wouldn't be contibuting my .02 here. just in case you were referring to me. i do visit for some time each season, follow the avy reports daily and talk snow with one of your avy forecasters/my touring partner on a regular basis.
snow related mistakes? yup, made a few myself, most of us have/do. not trying to ruffle feathers here (cept a poke at bob here and there, but i'm over it), just throwing out some ideas words that may catch the eye of the newer skiers out there.
you are right though, don't believe everything you read on the interweb.
rog |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keithermadness

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 24806
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: Re: KEITHERMINDLESSNESS |
|
|
| icelanticskier wrote: | | keithermadness wrote: |
Good thing you have actual experience in the Wasatch and know first hand this is not true. Don't believe everything you read on the intranets.
|
if i didn't have wasatch experience, and a fair bit of it (i used to spend some winters there) i wouldn't be contibuting my .02 here. just in case you were referring to me. i do visit for some time each season, follow the avy reports daily and talk snow with one of your avy forecasters/my touring partner on a regular basis.
snow related mistakes? yup, made a few myself, most of us have/do. not trying to ruffle feathers here (cept a poke at bob here and there, but i'm over it), just throwing out some ideas words that may catch the eye of the newer skiers out there.
you are right though, don't believe everything you read on the interweb.
rog |
That post was for Danno, whom I've skied with in the Wasatch. He questioned pretty hard a slope we skied on one snowy day. I saw no instability that day and we left nothing but tracks. Took away some pretty cool memories. _________________ ~km
"Everyday is a potential avalanche day."
-Missiongravity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|