| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eliasar
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Norway, Sunnmorsalps
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:32 pm Post subject: Length Hippi Stinx/Seth Pistol...? |
|
|
I am planning to buy new telemark skiis (Seth Pistol or Hippi Stinx) this winter, but I am no quite sure how long they should be. My weight: 78 Kg, (171.6 Lbs) and 181 cm tall. Somebody who can help me please?? Range of use: Big mountain, and in woods.. THANX!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ewong_kaizen
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 703 Location: City of Brotherly LOVE [Philly]
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im 5'6.
Weigh about 165 but I ski with a pack on (add 15 to the total?)
I ski a 179
Its HEAVY....
I couldnt see going longer. Shorter *might* be nice in the trees, but since all my ALPINE friends wont follow me in the trees ("too tight" they say - this is Jackson Hole, not Mad River - not such thing as too tight) I guess they are "short" enuff  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eliasar
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Norway, Sunnmorsalps
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:11 pm Post subject: Do u ski seth or hippi? |
|
|
| Ok. Do you ski seth pistol or hippi stinx? What do you prefer? What's the difference between the skiis anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Berko

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1536 Location: Fort Front Range
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
150#. hippies in 179cm. like E.K., I could go shorter for the trees.
I love these skis! _________________ Something's got a hold on me, and I don't know what . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
likwid

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 1008 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: Do u ski seth or hippi? |
|
|
| eliasar wrote: | | Ok. Do you ski seth pistol or hippi stinx? What do you prefer? What's the difference between the skiis anyway? |
the hippy stinx is the 04/05 seth pistol with different topsheet and ptex graphics
also the tele screw inserts
i'm kinda surprised you can't get the hippies in 159 like the pistols... the midget faction must be in an uproar
that is all. _________________ mad world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ewong_kaizen
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 703 Location: City of Brotherly LOVE [Philly]
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Berko wrote: | | I love these skis! |
I HATE these skis...
I have never skied so fast and danger on any other skis!
I scared myself silly barreling down runs at Jackson at warp speeds and then bashing through the trees. All I saw were snowboard tracks - no skis.
The skis dont turn - they just go. Its like yer brain thinks "turn there" and there ya go... It means that NOW I have to ski 30' to 40' ahead of where I used to look.
Rocks, stups, 4' hucks - all mean NOTHING to these skis - they just go right over em and keep going...
These skis are gonna KILLL me!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ofrogg

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 443 Location: Fort berkolins
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 170# here... I ride 179's. They're nice. They ski for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eliasar
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Norway, Sunnmorsalps
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:40 pm Post subject: what lenght? |
|
|
| okey... if my weight is 77 kg and my height is 5'9, then i should probably go for 189, or should i go for shorter (179)?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ofrogg

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 443 Location: Fort berkolins
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm pretty sold on the 179... but that's just my $0.02 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silas
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 78 Location: PNW
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
195#
6'
189cm
Great ski...just got to cut those damn tails off.....
It really depends on how you ski. If you ski very very fast and aggressive get the long ones. If you see yourself in tight trees go shorter. I would think the 179 would work well at 171# unless you really rip and like letting it go.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StevieG
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 2 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm 5'6" and I ski the 169 Seth Pistol. They are WAY SWEET. My friend who is ~6'4" just got the 189 Pistols. His wife who is about my size also skis the 169. We all seem to enjoy our skis a little too much Those skis are wide enough that you can go pretty short. And it’s nice having short skis for the trees. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FHLF #75

Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 71 Location: 10,000 feet and climbing in CA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
175# / 6' 1" tall and ski the 189 cm Hippies.
The length and size is reasonable to ski but the weight at 10 lbs unmounted (13.38 lbs. with O2 bindings) is a bit heavy to lug uphill in the backcountry IMO.
If it weren't for my poor performance in the bedroom, my addiction to Cialis and some psychological stuff, I would have gone with the 179 cm skis.
Like ewong said, you'll ski like an A-hole with these planks but if you are riding mostly lift-served areas, the weight won't matter that much unless you are hucking big air. _________________ Free Heel Liberation Front |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|