| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gumpie

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 220 Location: in the right spot
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:09 pm Post subject: help needed - can't decide on skis |
|
|
I'm fortune enough to have a cheap source for ONE pair of skis. Have to order by Tuesday.
I can get: either Atomic, Rossi, K2 or Salomon. My favorite so far is the TeleDaddy(183), but the TMX(184 or 191) sounds nice too. Usually I prefer skis with a wood core but the Atomics so far are the most attractive to me out of the four makers. Since the forum was down over the weekend I spend too much thinking about this and every other hour some thoughts about maybe going with a K2 Work Stinx or maybe a Rossi T4 or even some Salomon Scream's drove me crazy.
What are your thoughts  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telerob

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 402 Location: Nor'east
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Id go either the K2 or Atomic. I have Piste Stinx and TM22s. Both great although I used to swear by the K2s and the Atomics are making me forget that other pair, which my bro-in-law is mighty happy about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric O

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 5333 Location: Tahoe City
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Please say something first about your skiing preferences, and the types of snow where and when you typically ski. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dobish

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 3373 Location: Castilo de Dobish, Golden CO
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you seem to be looking at a couple of different styles of skis. I would avoid the T4 unless you are doing strictly BIG mountain stuff. The Teledaddy's handle well in just about anything as do the TMX. The TMX is going to be more versitile than the teledaddy. The work stinx is a nice ski also. If you are looking for something a little bit lighter and more of an all around ski, i would go with either the work stinx or the TMX (184) If you are looking for something to bust through crud, pow and has a super-stable base, go with the teledaddy. I think i'm putting in the order for mine after i finish typing this post! _________________ Smile when you're going down, it looks more graceful.
www.backcountrycoalition.com
www.splitloaves.wordpress.com www.flylowgear.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dobish

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 3373 Location: Castilo de Dobish, Golden CO
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dobish wrote: | | you seem to be looking at a couple of different styles of skis. I would avoid the T4 unless you are doing strictly BIG mountain stuff. The Teledaddy's handle well in just about anything as do the TMX. The TMX is going to be more versitile than the teledaddy. The work stinx is a nice ski also. If you are looking for something a little bit lighter and more of an all around ski, i would go with either the work stinx or the TMX (184) If you are looking for something to bust through crud, pow and has a super-stable base, go with the teledaddy. I think i'm putting in the order for mine after i finish typing this post! |
i never did buy these skis.... funny what ends up on the last page  _________________ Smile when you're going down, it looks more graceful.
www.backcountrycoalition.com
www.splitloaves.wordpress.com www.flylowgear.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jmedslc

Joined: 14 Dec 2004 Posts: 994 Location: BRightOn, UT
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Work Stinx indeed. _________________ --
'you sound like an english major baffled by simple engineering.'
- Carl |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grant

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 8581 Location: Firmly planted
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would wait until next year when the Karhu Jak BC or G3 Ticket come out. _________________ Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
!ski

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 6145 Location: Boulder CO
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Grant wrote: | | I would wait until next year when the Karhu Jak BC or G3 Ticket come out. |
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:09 am
I think the original poster already did ...
-r |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 7012 Location: Castle Rock, CO
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think Grant understood the date hence the dated recommendation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wickstad

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 705 Location: The Jefferson Institute
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the forum was down for more than just the weekend. _________________ Well, let's play chess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SkaredShtles

Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 9540 Location: In a van................ down by the river
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just get the red ones.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geo

Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 1994 Location: Moscow Mountain, PNW
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
simpler choices back then it seems.
I skied my atomic kongors the other day. Nice and light. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
titanal
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 181 Location: koots
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Funny, I get confronted with the same choices at ski swaps every fall.
I always get the orange ones . T4s rock. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_wright
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 3170 Location: Wenatchee
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wickstad wrote: | | I think the forum was down for more than just the weekend. | Just because you don't have internet on the weekends doesn't mean the forum is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gwen

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 3038
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wickstad wrote: | | I think the forum was down for more than just the weekend. |
The site server was rooted through a php buffer exploit a couple of months before. Mitch asked for help to analyze what was happening. I started looking into it over Thanksgiving weekend. On Thursday afternoon Dec 2, 2004, I discovered the root kit and the intruder online. Before I could terminate his session he got me (I was connected on a very slow link) and the dirtball subsequently destroyed the forum database and littered profane garbage all-over the website. I had the server shutdown and I asked the hosting service to add a new drive and install a more up-to-date distribution but leave the home file system and OS filesytem of the old drive so I could mount it read-only and inspect it. Also had them connect the host to a com port server so I could access it without it being on the net. Spent most of Thursday night doing forensics, running patches cleaning up the home filesystem and tried to handstitch the database back together. It was quickly evident recovery wasn't possible in our lifetimes. Unmounted the old rooted drive to save it for more forensic inspection later. Mitch and I are both on the West coast and the hosting service is in the middle of the country thousands of miles a way so we had a slight challenge doing everything remotely. We ordered a new box from the hosting service splitting the forum server to it while the old rebuilt host became just the main ttips server. Began transferring files from the old image. Mitch started uploading backed-up content while I was building a new forum server with updated phpBB software and security patches on a home system I would subsequently clone and upload to the new forum server. Made DNS requests on Friday with a shortened TTL to point to the new box so by Monday it would be seen by the rest of the world. By Sunday morning the new site was running but locked down. Mitch and I tested it most of the day Sunday and it was actually ready early Sunday evening. It took 3-days to recover--no miracles just a tedious deliberate process that had to be followed. We had no backup to the forum database at that time plus we brought on a new host and it takes time to expire DNS cache world-wide. The site could have been operation Saturday afternoon if we didn't have to deal with that.
Last edited by Gwen on Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:28 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|