Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Voile Vector
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Community Ski Reviews
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Detuning went through my head but I feel like it's like a last resort option. I'm in the group that believes that your edges should be sharp and usually never detuned to maximize carving effectiveness.

I think it was just a matter of getting used to skiing such a different design than I'm used to. I got used to it but some of my other gear wasn't dialed in. I think I had my NTNs on too high a preload and backed them down from Blue 3 to 2 which made the skis seem to relax and respond better. Too much tip input?

If you happen to ski hardpack and run into the same problem... see if you can lower the binding tension to see if it makes any difference before detuning. That would be nice if someone could offer a confirmation or if it doesn't matter.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bbense



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 7703
Location: Berkeley, CA /Tahoe

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My experience is only with the Vector BC and only one hard snow resort day, but I found that if I concentrated on really skiing "centered" rather than a more forward style the skis were much better behaved as carvers.

This means you have to throttle back a bit and be more mellow and swoopy, rather than really driving the skis. But if you really enjoy that you'd be on other skis anyway.

- Booker C. Bense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Booker... how do you have your BCs mounted? Thanks.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bbense



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 7703
Location: Berkeley, CA /Tahoe

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hdiddy wrote:
Booker... how do you have your BCs mounted? Thanks.


Tele boot center on Ski Center mark. It looked very far forward at first, but I talked to Voile and a few other vector skiers and that was the concensus view.

- Booker C. Bense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. I'll try going almost to BC and report my findings after this weekend.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Progress Report:
I was enjoying a resort weekend with them skiing the crappy leftovers and crusty/icy conditions at AM and Squaw. Lots and lots of moguls. I got everything dialed in for myself and finally satisfied with the performance. Boosted preloads back up to 3... maybe even a touch past 3. Prob the fault of my crispis as they're softening up.

Booker is spot on with the mount. Putting it on boot center to the mark on the ski makes a huge difference. Big difference even being just 1cm off. Get it on the center, the ski's weight feels balanced front to back and more importantly, it becomes crazy pivoty.

Booker is also spot on with skiing them with a balanced "centered" feel. Despite the non-rockered tail, it gets squirrelly if you accidently get into the backseat. Stay on top, stay centered and the skis charge. You can slarve everything to death cept for the tight moguls.

Def makes things easier but having come from more traditional skis, there's a strong sense of loss with the inability to carve aggressively. They just want to pivot and skid. On hardpack, it also means that the ski doesn't "give back" and pop or unload as there's no much flex to the camber. But I guess this isn't why you'd be on this ski either.

Hit plenty of rocks over the weekend. Bases seem pretty durable.

Overall, it could perform as a one-quiver ski. When things get firm and hard, it just wants to skid/slarve/smear through everything and can pick up a decent amount of speed while doing it. Very turny and playful. Def more of a soft conditions & bc type ski. On hard days, it gets the job done and help you keep up with your fast friends.

As a super turny ski, I'd say my Freerandos are more fun at slower speeds with lots and lots of turns. IMO, fun factor is pretty good in general but the skis start to shine when you put a little bit more speed on them in soft conditions. Long radius turns and moderate/fast speeds on untracked and soft snow - good stuff.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doug G



Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 2276
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hdiddy wrote:
Def makes things easier but having come from more traditional skis, there's a strong sense of loss with the inability to carve aggressively.


Similar experience on the Chargers, here. Cesare said re: these kinds of rockered/tapered skis, you can carve them with a light touch. At any rate, well worth the trade-off for the crud and powder performance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do have one negative comment about the Vector's construction. The top sheets do not seem that durable and get scuff/scratched easily. Already I've spent about 10 days total on them and the tails are getting chewed up pretty good. There's one spot where the tails got chipped bad and the fiberglass is showing and flopping around. Need to invest in some epoxy.

These are the first generation with the blue stripy thing going on.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hdiddy



Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 4093
Location: SF, CA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having spent an epic weekend in Tahoe with the Vectors, I'm really happy with them now that I've figured it out. Spent saturday in a Tele Clinic at Northstar (totally awesome btw) and learned a couple new tricks for pow. Yeah, a heavier ski would blast through everything, but the lightness also makes it fun and easy to get mid-air transitions. It's hard on the quads but with proper technique they can rip through the chop.

I wouldn't use it for resort skiing for intermediates. You get tossed pretty easy if you're not driving them well in chop. In untracked they almost ski themselves. Def my go-to soft snow ski now.

I finally sorta figured out a way to get them to carve well on 1-2 inches of soft. Get enough speed, get the tips to dig in and they'll lay over alot easier. You really have to be in front and now regret that I can only go up to -.5cm unless I remount. Boot Center on Boot Center mark is the way to go.
_________________
Drive the cuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hiplainsdrifter



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 2237
Location: Wyoming

PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually think the Vectors ski more like a traditional camber ski than any other rockers I have been on. They are very carvy. Of course, they are super light (good thing), which means they get pushed around a bit in choppy hard snow. Float is superb, I don't even really miss my Drifters when I am riding them on deep days. Really I think they are close to being my ultimate ski- the only thing I would change is to make em in a 185, and to get some better graphics.
_________________
let 'er buck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aaron_wright



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 3148
Location: Wenatchee

PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hiplainsdrifter wrote:
Really I think they are close to being my ultimate ski- the only thing I would change is to make em in a 185, and to get some better graphics.
I think Voile is making them in a 190 next season. Anybody know if this is true?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bbense



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 7703
Location: Berkeley, CA /Tahoe

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aaron_wright wrote:
hiplainsdrifter wrote:
Really I think they are close to being my ultimate ski- the only thing I would change is to make em in a 185, and to get some better graphics.
I think Voile is making them in a 190 next season. Anybody know if this is true?


I would definitely buy a pair ( even at full retail and w/o the waxless base).

- Booker C. Bense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Quadzilla



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2274
Location: Washoe Valley, Nevada

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bbense wrote:
aaron_wright wrote:
hiplainsdrifter wrote:
Really I think they are close to being my ultimate ski- the only thing I would change is to make em in a 185, and to get some better graphics.
I think Voile is making them in a 190 next season. Anybody know if this is true?


I would definitely buy a pair ( even at full retail and w/o the waxless base).

- Booker C. Bense


Would be interesting to see how much if any growth dimensioinally a 190 Vector would have. I would guess the waist would probably grow to maybe 100 or so and probably some added girth to tip and tail as well. I think I could be interested as a dual purpose resort/BC tele ski. I really like the way my 180 BC's ski and really like how well the X2 bindings work for me too. But, maybe a old age thing but I am getting used to having a releasable binding on my feet for any serious skiing so that issue would need to be sorted out without compromising the light weight of the skis and not that interested in having another Dynafit kit.
_________________
Just Say No To Groomed Snow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
bbense



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 7703
Location: Berkeley, CA /Tahoe

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quadzilla wrote:


Would be interesting to see how much if any growth dimensioinally a 190 Vector would have. I would guess the waist would probably grow to maybe 100 or so and probably some added girth to tip and tail as well.


That would ruin it for me. What I like about the vector is you get most of the crud benefits of a bigger ski w/o the extra width and weight. Making it just a bit longer would add enough extra float and stablity for even the deeper days w/o compromising the performance on regular days. It would also give you a longer arc on the harder stuff where you're most skiing on the center camber of the ski.

Quote:
But, maybe a old age thing but I am getting used to having a releasable binding on my feet for any serious skiing so that issue would need to be sorted out without compromising the light weight of the skis and not that interested in having another Dynafit kit.


Inserts allow me to switch between 7tm and Voile ( and even Dynafit with Dobish plates ). I know aaron thinks this is dumb, but it works for me.

- Booker C. Bense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
_Uli



Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 202
Location: Les Granges (VS)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bbense wrote:
Quadzilla wrote:


Would be interesting to see how much if any growth dimensioinally a 190 Vector would have. I would guess the waist would probably grow to maybe 100 or so and probably some added girth to tip and tail as well.


That would ruin it for me. . . .


So for me! Here (the Alps!) for skiing steeps with often different snow conditions varying from powder to farineuse to icy/cruddy a ski with more than 95/96 at center definitely would be too large.

I think the Vector really is a well done ski, the flat tip combined to the soft rocker is really an excellent idea, helps a lot in the crust. Two things that could be improved, for my taste are:

a) something like an indention in tail (for the skin fixation; like the K2 skis e.g. or the Karhu have respectively had);

b) eventually a slightly stiffer flex (recently i mounted dynafits on my Vectors and, skiing talon fixe i find them a little bit weak; for tele skiing the flex was fine. May be they could offer 2 different flexes?).

Cheers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     Forum Index -> Community Ski Reviews All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




 

Dr. Telemark (reviews, etc.) | Forum Guidelines | Search | Legal/Terms of Use

All of the comments above are owned by the poster, telemarktips.com is not responsible in any way for the content. The views expressed by the posters are not necessarily those of Tt.com, its management or owners. Ski safe, be happy, rip it up, smile on your brother and sister!